A backlog turned into a result every two weeks.
When the list is longer than one fix. Small governed streams, the same named team throughout, a release every two weeks with a rollback path. This is how GoodLeap went from a 6–12-month internal baseline to weeks.
GoodLeap: delivery from a 6–12-month baseline to weeks, 13 governed releases, 0 critical incidents
The backlog is months long. Each item waits for the one person who knows the org.
Requests come in faster than anything ships. The admin is the bottleneck, the last partner's code is undocumented, and every release is a weekend. Priorities change before the previous change is live.
You do not need more people in the queue. You need a queue that empties on a schedule, with someone accountable for each result.
A named team, a two-week cadence, a result each time.
A result every two weeks
Each stream has one named outcome and a date. You see it ship or you hear why in the first days, never at the end.
The same team throughout
Lead engineer, developer, QA; analyst and project manager when the scope needs them. No rotation.
Releases that do not break Friday
DEV, QA and UAT, Go/No-Go before every release, smoke tests, rollback. 13 releases, 0 critical incidents.
A monthly review in hours and dollars
What shipped, what it returned, what is next. The backlog re-prioritised with what we learned.
Every change leaves a record.
Who asked, who built, where it was tested, who approved, how it rolls back. The format your compliance team can file.
Nightly loan-org sync moved to a scheduled job
- Requested by
- Head of Lending OperationsTransfers failed silently twice a month; found in the morning
- Built by
- Lead engineer, named in the proposalSame two people since release 1
- Tested in
- A full copy of the system, then by the usersTest script signed by the operations lead
- Approved by
- Compliance ✓ IT ✓ Business owner ✓
- Release window
- Friday, 02:00–06:00 ETRollback tested: 20 minutes, no data loss
- Result
- No incidents. Thirteenth change to the live system. None of the thirteen caused one.
Every two weeks, the same loop.
Backlog and the first result
Prioritise with you; the first stream is named and dated before the contract starts.
Stream one
Build, UAT, release. The change record goes to your compliance file.
Stream two
The next result. Backlog re-prioritised with what we learned.
Review
What shipped, what it returned in hours or dollars, what comes next.
Questions, and what is not included.
Fixed price after scoping. The Health Check fee is credited in full.
If the scope was wrong, we say so in the first days and re-scope before any work.
How is "from $9,000" scoped?
Can we stop?
How is this different from Run?
Does the Health Check credit apply?
Not included
- Staff augmentation: we own results, not seats.
- Work outside Salesforce and its integrations.
- Twenty-four-hour support: that is Run, and it can sit alongside.
Make your Salesforce earn.
Thirty minutes, one hypothesis about your business, no pitch. We reply within one business day.
One reply from a person, within one business day.